Skip to content

To bring about breakthroughs in international space research

  • Home
  • Onderzoeksvragen
  • Pijlers
  • Missies
  • Over ons
  • Contact
Home
    Home

    SRON | Wetenschappelijk ruimteonderzoek Nederland

    To bring about breakthroughs in international space research

    Home
    • Onderzoeksvragen
    • Pijlers
      • Wetenschap
      • Technologie
      • Instrumentatie
      • Onze mensen
      • Impact
    • Missies
    • Over ons
    • Actueel
    • Contact
    • SRON Academy
    • Werken bij
    • Bezoek aan SRON
    Home
      • Onderzoeksvragen
        • Hoe ontrafelen we de fysica achter zwarte gaten?
        • Hoe kunnen we de zwakste exoplaneten waarnemen?
        • Waar worden broeikasgassen uitgestoten?
        • Hoe speciaal is de aarde in de context van het heelal?
        • Hoe ontstaan en groeien zwarte gaten?
        • Hoe beïnvloeden aerosolen het klimaat?
        • Hoe ontstaan sterren en planeten?
        • Hoe beïnvloedt klimaatverandering het leven op aarde?
      • Pijlers
        • Wetenschap
          • Aardobservatie
            • Methaan
            • Aerosolen en Wolken
            • CO2
            • Koolmonoxide
          • Astrofysica
            • Lage energie
            • Hoge energie
            • Exoplaneten
        • Technologie
        • Instrumentatie
          • Nanotechnologie
          • Cryogenica
          • Optica
          • Electronica
          • PA/QA kwaliteit
          • Mechanica / Realisatie
        • Onze mensen
        • Impact
      • Missies
        • Actief
          • ALMA
          • GUSTO
          • PACE
          • Sentinel-5p
          • SPEX airborne
          • XRISM
        • In ontwikkeling
          • ARIEL
          • LISA
          • Metop-SG A
        • Legacy
          • BeppoSAX
          • STO2
      • Over ons
        • Faciliteiten
        • Geschiedenis
      • Actueel
      • Contact
      • SRON Academy
      • Werken bij
      • Bezoek aan SRON
      • Privacy policy
      01/07/2023

      East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis

      We apply atmospheric methane column retrievals from two different satellite instruments (Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite – GOSAT; TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument – TROPOMI) to a regional inversion framework to quantify East Asian methane emissions for 2019 at 0.5∘ × 0.625∘ horizontal resolution. The goal is to assess if GOSAT (relatively mature but sparse) and TROPOMI (new and dense) observations inform consistent methane emissions from East Asia with identically configured inversions. Comparison of the results from the two inversions shows similar correction patterns to the prior inventory in central northern China, central southern China, northeastern China, and Bangladesh, with less than 2.6 Tg a-1 differences in regional posterior emissions. The two inversions, however, disagree over some important regions, particularly in northern India and eastern China. The methane emissions inferred from GOSAT observations are 7.7 Tg a-1 higher than those from TROPOMI observations over northern India but 6.4 Tg a-1 lower over eastern China. The discrepancies between the two inversions are robust against varied inversion configurations (i.e., assimilation window and error specifications). We find that the lower methane emissions from eastern China inferred by the GOSAT inversion are more consistent with independent ground-based in situ and total column (TCCON) observations, indicating that the TROPOMI retrievals may have high XCH4 biases in this region. We also evaluate inversion results against tropospheric aircraft observations over India during 2012-2014 by using a consistent GOSAT inversion of earlier years as an intercomparison platform. This indirect evaluation favors lower methane emissions from northern India inferred by the TROPOMI inversion. We find that in this case the discrepancy in emission inference is contributed by differences in data coverage (almost no observations by GOSAT vs. good spatial coverage by TROPOMI) over the Indo-Gangetic Plain. The two inversions also differ substantially in their posterior estimates for northwestern China and neighboring Kazakhstan, which is mainly due to seasonally varying biases between GOSAT and TROPOMI XCH4 data that correlate with changes in surface albedo.

      SRON Leiden

      Leiden

      Niels Bohrweg 4
      2333 CA Leiden
      The Netherlands
      +31 (0)88 777 56 00

      SRON Groningen

      Groningen

      Landleven 12
      9747 AD Groningen
      The Netherlands
      +31 (0)50 363 40 74

      • Onderzoeksvragen
      • Pijlers
        • Wetenschap
        • Technologie
        • Instrumentatie
        • Onze mensen
        • Impact
      • Missies
      • Over ons
      • Actueel
      • Contact
      SRON on bluesky SRON on Instagram SRON on LinkedIn

      Niels Bohrweg 4
      2333 CA Leiden
      The Netherlands
      +31 (0)88 777 56 00

      Landleven 12
      9747 AD Groningen
      The Netherlands
      +31 (0)50 363 40 74

      NWO-I

      SRON is onderdeel van de institutenorganisatie van NWO-I

      • Privacy policy
      Home

      What happens up there, starts down here.