Footnotes
- notes in line 1
- line 1 note 1-1
C: in, D: IGI
- line 1 note 2 B: e\th-li
- line 1 note 3 D: -ma
- line 1 note 4 D: omits
- line 1 note 5 D: -át
- line 1 note 6-6 D: IGI
- line 1 note 7 D: -la\th
- notes in line 2
- line 2 note 2 D: i-liq-qu-nik-ki
- line 2 note 3 D inserts :
- line 2 note 4 D: pi?-(copy:RAD)-til over 2 lines
- notes in line 3
- line 3 note 1 D omits
- line 3 note 2 D erasure
- line 3 note 3 D: tú-
- line 3 note 4 -lu\th
- line 3 note 5 D omits?
- notes in line 4
- line 4 note 1 D omits
- line 2 note 2-2 After a division line D writes out
in full the brief ritual instruction referred to;
its lacunous text covering four short lines, three
at the bottom of the obverse and one at the top of
the reverse, is duplicated by Ms.C, l.1 in a largely preserved state.
Squeezed into a single line the full text of the ritual there occurs
at its proper place in the Ninerite Recension of
"\Sj. amëlu ïnä\sju mar\sä".
After a small gap, which can be restored from D as follows:
DÙ.DÙ.BI SÍG S[A5 SÍG BABBAR/GI6 ...],
C continues:
... 1-ni\sj NU.NU 7 u 7
KA.KÉ\Sj KÉ\Sj e-ma
KÉ\Sj ÉN \SjID-nu ina
SAG.KI.ME\Sj(D:II-\sjú)
KÉ\Sj-ma TI-u\th
- notes in line 6
- line 6 note 1 D:AN-ne
- line 6 note 2 D: IM
- line 2 note 3-3 D: i-ni
- line 2 note 4 D: sim-mu
- line 2 note 5
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- notes in line 7
- line 7 note 1 D: sù.ud.da
- line 7 note 2 D: lú gig
- notes in line 8
- line 2 note 1 D: ul-tú
- line 2 note 2 D inserts:
\sjá-a-ru i-zi-qam-ma ina i-ni LÚ
sim-mu i\sj-ta-kan
- line 2 note 3 cf. 65
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- notes in line 9
- line 9 note 1 D omits
- line 9 note 2 D omits
- line 9 note 3
omitted in B and D, which set out the Sumerian and Akkadian versions
one to a line
- line 9 note 4 D: ina
- line 9 note 5 D: i-ni
- line 9 note 6 D omits
- line 9 note 7 B: -ma
- line 9 note 8 D: sim-mu
- line 9 note 9 ll. 9-22 largely missing in C
- line 9 note 10cf. 65
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- notes in line 10
- line 10 note 1 cf.\ 93
omitted in B and D, which set out the Sumerian and Akkadian versions
one to a line
- line 10 note 2 replaced by 11: 1-1
- line 10 note 3 D: \sju-u
- line 10 note 4 B erroneously: -da-
- line 10 note 5-5 D: IGIII-\sjú
- line 10 note 6-6 D: dal-
- line 10 note 7 cf.\ 65
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- notes in line 11
- line 11 note 1 replaced by 10
- line 11 note 2 D omits
- line 11 note 3 present in D; B omits, cf.\ 93
- line 11 note 4 cf.\ 65
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- notes in line 12
- line 2 note 1 D omits
- notes in line 13
- line 2 note 1 D omits
- line 2 note 2 B: -b\Lhook a-ak-a
- notes in line 14
- line 2 note 1 D: íd
- line 2 note 2 cf.\ 93
omitted in B and D, which set out the Sumerian and Akkadian versions
one to a line
- line 2 note 3 D omits
- line 2 note 4 B: \sju-a-tu6
- line 2 note 5-5 D: GIG-
- line 2 note 6 D: ÍD
- line 2 note 7 cf.\ 65
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- notes in line 15
- line 2 note 1
D: al.\sje6.gá/al.kúm.mà
- line 2 note 2 D: u
- line 2 note 3 cf.\ 93
omitted in B and D, which set out the Sumerian and Akkadian versions
one to a line
- line 2 note 4 D: -e
- line 2 note 5-5 D: ba-á\sj-lu-te
- line 2 note 6 D: -qi-
- line 2 note 7 cf.\ 65
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- notes in line 16
- line 2 note 1
but for ... .t\rtop a\rbot.u.\lbot m\ltop e ...
missing in D
- line 2 note 2 B: ù
- line 2 note 3 cf.\ 93
omitted in B and D, which set out the Sumerian and Akkadian versions
one to a line
- notes in line 17
- line 2 note 1 largely missing in D
- line 2 note 2 D: .bi
- line 2 note 3-3 D: u.me!.\ltop ni\rtop!.
- line 2 note 4 cf.\ 93,
omitted in B which set out the Sumerian and Akkadian versions
one to a line, present in D
- line 2 note 5-5 D: \ltop LÚ\rtop
- line 2 note 6 cf.\ 65
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- notes in line 18
- line 2 note 1 D: íd
- line 2 note 2 D omits
- line 2 note 3 D: .a.né
- line 2 note 4 D: .bi.ta
- notes in line 19
- line 2 note 1 D: \SjUII-\sjú
- line 2 note 2 D: -te
- line 2 note 3-3 D: i-ni
- line 2 note 4 D: LÚ
- line 2 note 5 D: -pa-
- line 2 note 6 cf.\ 65
in D the separate portions of the incantation,
i.e. the Sumerian clauses along with their Akkadian renderings,
are ruled off from each other by division lines
- line 2 note 7 ll. 9-22 largely missing in B
- notes in line 20
- line 2 note 1 D: -GI\Sj
- line 2 note 2 D: .\sjè
- line 2 note 3 D omits
- notes in line 21
- line 2 note 1 B: -rù
- line 2 note 2 D: i-ni
- line 2 note 3-3 D: LÚ
- line 2 note 4 D adds: ÉN
- notes in line 22
- line 2 note 1
D: \sjá IGIII.ME\Sj GIG.ME\Sj
- line 2 note 2 D has the subscripts followed by a
therapeutical prescription set out over three short lines at the
bottom of its reverse, thus being its
final text portion. It reads:
DÙ.DÙ.BI GAZIsar \SjEG6-\sjal
SÚD $\mid$ ÉN
an-ni-te 7-\sjú ana UGU \SjID-nu
$\mid$
LÁ-ma ina-ah
Maintained and updated by:
last modification on May 1, 1998
(error in footnote)